🎯
Interactive input
The platform asks 40+ structured questions — claim charts, product financials, venue, invalidity risk.
Patent Damages Engine
Meridian is a conversational platform that walks users through each layer of a damages opinion — interrogating the facts, applying validated algorithms and stress-testing every assumption before producing a court-ready output.
What Meridian is
🎯
The platform asks 40+ structured questions — claim charts, product financials, venue, invalidity risk.
⚖
All 15 Georgia-Pacific factors scored, weighted and mapped to comparable license data.
🎲
10,000-iteration Monte Carlo over IPR risk, § 101 risk, venue and validity probability.
📊
P10/P50/P90 exposure range, methodology narrative, JSON/CSV export for downstream use.
How it works
Venue, hypothetical negotiation date, patent numbers, claim strength scoring.
SSPPU identification, infringing revenue, apportionment factor, EMVR eligibility check.
All 15 GP factors scored via guided Q&A, with comparable license normalization.
Inter partes review probability, subject matter eligibility, judge-level Daubert risk flags.
Opposing counsel win rates, expert witness track records, settlement propensity scoring.
10,000 iterations across rate, apportionment, validity and infringement probability.
Exposure band, methodology narrative and audit trail exported for IC memos and underwriting files.
Nuance coverage
Four proprietary risk layers unavailable in any other patent valuation tool.
PTAB institution rates by art unit, petitioner track record, patent age and claim breadth. Applied as a Bernoulli probability multiplier on all damages outputs.
67% avg PTAB institution rateArt-unit specific
District-by-district win rates, median award calibration, judge-level Daubert intensity, and W.D. Texas Waco division data through Q1 2026.
WD Tex +8–12%D. Del +5–8%7 districts mapped
Subject matter eligibility scoring via claim abstraction analysis. Software, business method and diagnostic patents carry elevated § 101 flags that compress the damages range.
Alice/Mayo doctrine mappedCPC class scoring
Opposing counsel win/loss records, damages-expert Daubert challenge success rates, settlement propensity index and litigation duration modeling by firm.
Expert track recordSettlement index
Sample output
Illustrative output — US semiconductor case · W.D. Texas · 3 patents asserted · 2 accused products.
P10 — conservative
$18.4M
P50 — central estimate
$47.2M
P90 — aggressive
$112.8M
Expected value
$53.6M
95% confidence interval: $14.1M – $138.4M · royalty rate range 2.8%–7.4% on a $640M SSPPU base.
Competitive position
| Capability | Meridian | Best competitor |
|---|---|---|
| Predictive damages output | ✓ | ✗ |
| IPR risk modeling | ✓ | ✗ |
| § 101 Alice risk scoring | ✓ | ✗ |
| Law firm / expert metrics | ✓ | ✗ |
| Monte Carlo simulation | ✓ | Partial |
| 15-factor GP interrogation | ✓ | Manual |
| Interoperable JSON/CSV export | ✓ | ✗ |
Capital & insurance coverage
Probabilistic case selection for IP-focused funds: MOIC/NPV, tranche sizing and stage-gate deployment on a per-case Reliability Index.
MOIC / NPV @ 25%Stage-gate tranches
Post-verdict JPI underwriting: reversal and remittitur probability on appeal, attachment-point pricing, layered-tower correlation.
CAFC 34.5% reversalLayered tower
Case selection for plaintiff-side firms: expected fee recovery, break-even hour budget and Daubert exclusion risk on damages experts.
Break-even hour budget
One reproducible engine feeds fund IC memos, law-firm intake committees and JPI underwriters — the same P10/P50/P90 across the capital stack.
Audit-ready trail
Bring a live case or a closed one — we will show you the exposure band, the driver waterfall and the audit trail.
Request a demo